|
Measuring Up 2002 Sources PREPARATION
18- to 24-year-olds with a high school
credential U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October 1998,
1999, and 2000 Supplements. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer
Consultants, 2002. 9th to 12th
graders taking at least one upper-level math course Rolf K. Blank and Doreen Langesen. State Indicators of Science and Mathematics
Education 2001: State-by-State Trends and New Indicators from the 1999–2000
School Year. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers,
2002, p. 43. 9th to 12th graders
taking at least one upper-level science course Rolf K. Blank and Doreen Langesen. State Indicators of Science and Mathematics
Education 2001: State-by-State Trends and New Indicators from the 1999–2000
School Year. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers,
2002, p. 44. 8th grade students taking
Algebra Rolf K. Blank and Doreen Langesen. State Indicators of Science and Mathematics
Education 2001: State-by-State Trends and New Indicators from the 1999–2000
School Year. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers,
2002, p. 46. 12th graders taking at
least one upper-level math course Calculations based on unpublished data
provided by Science and Math Indicator Project Team at Council of Chief State
School Officers. The data are from the same source that was used for: Rolf K.
Blank and Doreen Langesen. State
Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education 2001: State-by-State Trends and
New Indicators from the 1999–2000 School Year. Washington, D.C.: Council of
Chief State School Officers, 2002. 8th graders scoring at or
above “proficient” on the national assessment exam in math National Assessment of Educational
Progress. The Nation’s Report Card,
Mathematics 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics/
(accessed 2/15/02). 8th graders scoring at or
above “proficient” on the national assessment exam in reading National Assessment of Educational
Progress. 1998 National and State Reading
Summary Data Tables for Grade 8 Student Data. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Education, 1998. 8th graders scoring at or
above “proficient” on the national assessment exam in science National Assessment of Educational
Progress. The Nation’s Report Card,
Science 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/science/
(accessed 11/21/01). 8th graders scoring at or
above “proficient” on the national assessment exam in writing National Assessment of Educational
Progress. 1998 National and State Writing
Summary Data Tables for Grade 8 Student Data. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Education, 1998. Low-income 8th graders
scoring at or above “proficient” on the national assessment exam in math National Assessment of Educational
Progress. The Nation’s Report Card,
Mathematics 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics/
(accessed 2/15/02). Number of scores in the top 20%
nationally on SAT/ACT college entrance exams per 1,000 high school graduates The College Board. “2001 SAT V+M Score
Bands Report,” unpublished report, New York, 2001. ACT. “Percent of 2001 High School
Graduates with ACT Composite Scores of 26 or Higher,” unpublished analysis,
Iowa City, Iowa, 2001. Western Interstate Commission for
Higher Education. Knocking at the College
Door: Projections of High School Graduates by State and Race/Ethnicity
1996–2012. Boulder, CO: 1998. Number of scores that are 3 or higher
on an Advanced Placement subject test per 1,000 high school juniors and seniors The College Board. State and National Annual Summary Reports.
New York. http://www.collegeboard.com/ap/library/state_nat_rpts_01.html
(accessed 6/14/02). Performance Gaps
18- to 24-year-olds with a high school
credential U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October 1998,
1999, and 2000 Supplements. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer
Consultants, 2002. 9th to 12th graders
taking at least one upper-level math course Rolf K. Blank and Doreen Langesen. State Indicators of Science and Mathematics
Education 2001: State-by-State Trends and New Indicators from the 1999–2000
School Year. Table 17: “Race/Ethnic Differences in Students Taking
Chemistry and Algebra 2/Integrated Math 3.” Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief
State School Officers, 2002, p. 49. 9th to 12th graders
taking at least one upper-level science course Rolf K. Blank and Doreen Langesen. State Indicators of Science and Mathematics
Education 2001: State-by-State Trends and New Indicators from the 1999–2000
School Year. Table 17: “Race/Ethnic Differences in Students Taking
Chemistry and Algebra 2/Integrated Math 3.” Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief
State School Officers, 2002, p. 49. Change Over Time
18- to 24-year-olds with a high school
credential (1989 to 1999)
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October 1988,
1989, 1990, 1998, 1999, and 2000 Supplements. State-level data provided by Pinkerton
Computer Consultants, 2002. 9th to 12th graders
taking at least one upper-level math course (1990 to 2000)
Rolf K. Blank and Doreen Langesen. State Indicators of Science and Mathematics
Education 2001: State-by-State Trends and New Indicators from the 1999–2000
School Year. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers,
2002, p. 43. 9th to 12th graders
taking at least one upper-level science course (1990 to 2000)
Rolf K. Blank and Doreen Langesen. State Indicators of Science and Mathematics
Education 2001: State-by-State Trends and New Indicators from the 1999–2000
School Year. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers,
2002, p. 44. PARTICIPATION
High school freshmen enrolling in
college within 4 years in any state
Thomas Mortenson, “Chance for College by Age 19.” Postsecondary Education Opportunity. No. 98, August 2000. http://www.postsecondary.org
(accessed 11/5/01). 18- to 24-year-olds enrolling in
college U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October 1998,
1999, and 2000 Supplements. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer
Consultants, 2002. 25- to 49-year-olds enrolled part-time
in some type of postsecondary education National Center for Education
Statistics. “Fall Enrollment Survey, 1999–2000,” unpublished tabulation provided by Tom Snyder at NCES, U.S.
Department of Education, Washington, D.C. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October 1999
Supplement. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002. Performance Gaps
18- to 24-year-olds enrolling in
college U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October 1998,
1999, and 2000 Supplements. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer
Consultants, 2002. Change Over Time
18- to
24-year-olds enrolling in college (1989 to 1999) U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October 1988,
1989, 1990, 1998, 1999, and 2000 Supplements. State-level data provided by
Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002. Note
Percentage of students going on to college
out-of-state
National Center for
Education Statistics. Digest of Education
Statistics 2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2002, p.
239. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/digest2001/
(accessed 8/4/02). AFFORDABILITY
Percent of income (average of all
income groups) needed to pay for college expenses minus financial aid: §
at public 4-year
colleges/universities §
at private 4-year
colleges/universities Tuition and room and
board: National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics 2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Education, 2002, p. 361. Pell grants: Office of Postsecondary Education. Title IV/ Pell Grant End of the Year Report
2000–2001. U.S. Department of Education, 2002, Table 21. Institutional aid: Sam Barbett and Roslyn Korb. Current Fund Revenues and Expenditures of Degree Granting Institutions,
Fiscal Year 1996. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education
Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, 1999, Tables 10, 11 and 12. Family income by quintile: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, March 1999, 2000, and 2001 Supplements.
Washington, D.C.: Census Bureau. State-level data provided by Pinkerton
Computer Consultants. 2002. Grant phase-out
information: National Center for
Education Statistics. National
Postsecondary Student Aid Survey, 1999. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department
of Education. Data Analysis System Variables: PELLAMT, INSTAMT, STATNEED, STATNOND, TOTGRT By CINCOME. Filtered by
institution level and control for public 2-year, public 4-year, and private
4-year. State grants (need-
and non-need-based): Kristen
DeSalvatore, National Association of
State Student Grant and Aid Programs 32nd Annual Survey, 2000–2001
Academic Survey Report. Albany, NY: National Association of State Student
Grant and Aid Programs, 2002, Table 1. Full-time equivalent
enrollment: National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics 2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Education, 2002, p. 236. Consumer price index: Bureau
of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index
1996–2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor. http://www.bls.gov (accessed
5/13/02). State grant aid targeted to low-income
families as a percent of federal Pell Grant aid to low-income families Pell grants: Office
of Postsecondary Education. Title IV/
Pell Grant End of the Year Report, 2000–2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Education, 2002, Table 21. State grants: Kristen DeSalvatore, National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs 32nd
Annual Survey, 2000–2001 Academic Survey Report. Albany, NY: National
Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs, 2002, Table 1. Share of income that poorest families need to pay for tuition at lowest
priced colleges Tuition: National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2001.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2002, p. 361. Family income for the lowest
quintile: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current
Population Survey, March 1999, 2000, and 2001 Supplements. Washington,
D.C.: Census Bureau. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer Consultants,
2002. Average
loan amount that undergraduate students borrow each year FFELP loans: National
Center for Education Statistics. FFELP
Report AY2000–2001, Total Loan Guarantees for Undergraduates Only. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2001. Direct loans: National
Center for Education Statistics. Direct
Loans to Undergraduates AY2000–2001, Number of Loans and Gross Commitments. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2001. COMPLETION
1st year community college
students returning their 2nd year ACT. “Institutional Data Questionnaire, Fall 2000,”
unpublished analysis by ACT, Iowa City, Iowa, 2001. Freshmen at 4-year colleges/universities returning their sophomore year ACT. “Institutional Data Questionnaire, Fall 2000,”
unpublished analysis by ACT, Iowa City, Iowa, 2001. First-time, full-time students
completing a bachelor’s degree within 5 years of high school completion ACT. “Institutional Data Questionnaire, Fall 2000,”
unpublished analysis by ACT, Iowa City, Iowa, 2001. First-time, full-time students
completing a bachelor’s degree within 6 years of college entrance National Center for Educational
Statistics. Graduation Rate Survey, 1999 (preliminary
data, Peer Analysis System). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov (accessed
6/15/02). Certificates, degrees and diplomas awarded at all colleges and
universities per 100 undergraduate students Total awards: National Center for Education Statistics. Completion Survey, 1999–2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department
of Education, 2002. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer
Consultants, 2002. Undergraduate
enrollments: National Center for Education
Statistics. Fall Enrollment Survey,
1999–2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2002.
State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002. Performance Gaps
Certificates, degrees and diplomas awarded at all colleges and
universities per 100 undergraduate students Total awards: National Center for Education Statistics. Completion Survey, 1999–2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department
of Education, 2002. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer
Consultants, 2002. Undergraduate
enrollments: National Center for Education
Statistics. Fall Enrollment Survey,
1999–2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2002.
State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002. BENEFITS
Population aged 25 to 65 with bachelor’s degree or higher U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October
1998, 1999, and 2000 Supplements. Washington, D.C. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002.
Total personal income: Bureau of Economic Analysis. State Personal Income, Annual and Quarterly, for All States and
Regions 1999. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/spi/drill.cfm
(accessed 4/1/02). Increase in total personal income as a
result of the percentage of the population with some college (including an
associate’s degree), but not a bachelor’s degree
Median earnings: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, March 1998, 1999, and 2000 Supplements.
Washington, D.C. State-level data
provided by Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002. Total population with some college
(including an associate’s degree):
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current
Population Survey, October 1998, 1999, and 2000 Supplements. Washington,
D.C. State-level data provided by
Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002. Total personal income: Bureau of Economic Analysis. State Personal Income, Annual and Quarterly, for All States and
Regions, 1999. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/spi/drill.cfm
(accessed 4/1/02). Residents voting in 1998 and 2000
national elections U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, November Voting and Registration, 1998 &
2000. Washington, D.C. http://www.census.gov (accessed 6/14/02). Of those who itemize on federal income
taxes, the percentage declaring charitable gifts Internal Revenue Service. Statistics of Income for Tax Year 2000.
Annual State Tax Reports. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Treasury. http://www.irs.ustreas.gov/pub/irs-soi/00in54cm.exe
(accessed 5/6/02). Adults demonstrating high-level
quantitative literacy skills National Center for Education Statistics. National Adult Literacy Survey, 1992.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1994. Collecting agency:
Educational Testing Service. Special analysis for non-oversample states by
Stephen Reder, Portland State University. Adults demonstrating
high-level prose literacy skills
National Center for Education Statistics. National Adult Literacy Survey, 1992.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1994. Collecting agency:
Educational Testing Service. Special analysis for non-oversample states by
Stephen Reder, Portland State University. Adults demonstrating high-level document literacy
skills National Center for Education Statistics. National Adult Literacy Survey, 1992.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1994. Collecting agency:
Educational Testing Service. Special analysis for non-oversample states by
Stephen Reder, Portland State University. Performance Gaps
Population aged 25 to 65 with bachelor’s degree or higher U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October
1998, 1999, and 2000 Supplements. Washington, D.C. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002.
Net loss revenue (2000)
Population and earnings differential: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Survey, March: Annual Demographic File, 1999–2001 [Computer
file]. Washington, D.C.: 2001. Calculations by David W. Wright, Associate
Professor of Sociology, Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas. Total personal income: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Annual State Personal Income 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Commerce. http://www.bea.gov/
(accessed 5/9/02). Due to small sample size, data are not available for Maine,
New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming. Change Over Time
Population aged 25 to 65 with bachelor’s degree or higher (1989 to
1999) U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, October
1988, 1989, 1990, 1998, 1999, and 2000 Supplements. State-level data provided
by Pinkerton Computer Consultants, 2002. STATE CONTEXT TABLE
U.S. Bureau of the Census. State Population Estimates, 2001. Time Series of State Population
Estimates, Table ST-2001EST-01. http://www.census.gov/ (accessed
5/29/02). Gross state product
(1999)
Bureau of Economic Analysis. Gross State Product for States. Regional Accounts Data. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, 2001. http://www.bea.gov/ (accessed 5/22/02). LEADING INDICATORS TABLE
Projected % change in population (2000–2015) U.S. Bureau of the Census. Population Projections for States, 1995–2025. Washington, D.C.:
1999. Projected % change in number of all high school
graduates (1998–2010) Western Interstate Commission for
Higher Education. Knocking at the College
Door: Projections of High School Graduates by State and Race/Ethnicity,
1996–2012. Boulder, CO: 1998. Projected budget
surplus/shortfall by 2008
Harold Hovey. State
Spending for Higher Education in the Next Decade: The Battle to Sustain Current
Support. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher
Education, 1999. Average income of poorest 20% of population (2000) U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, March 1999, 2000, and 2001 Supplements.
Washington, D.C. State-level data provided by Pinkerton Computer Consultants,
2002. Annie E. Casey Foundation. Kids Count. Baltimore, MD: 2002. http://www.aecf.org/kidscount/c2ss/pdfs/entire_book.pdf.
Percent of population with less than a high school
diploma or equivalent (2000) U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey, March 2000 Supplement. Washington, D.C.
http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/education/p20-536/tab13.pdf
(accessed 7/19/2002). Progressive Policy Institute. The State New Economy Index. Washington, D.C.: 2002. http://www.neweconomyindex.org/states/2002/overall_rank.html
(accessed 6/14/02). FACTS AND FIGURES TABLE
Institutions of postsecondary education
(2000–1)
Students enrolled by institution type
(1999)
Students enrolled by level (1999)
Enrollment status of students (1999)
Net migration of students (1998)
Average tuition (2000–1)
National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2001.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2002.
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/digest2001/
(accessed 5/29/02). General Education Development (GED)
diploma
Number of GED diplomas issued to young adults, ages
16 to 24: General Educational
Development Testing Service of the American Council on Education. Who Took the GED? GED 2001 Statistical
Report. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 2002. Number of high school graduates in 2000–01: Western Interstate Commission for Higher
Education. Knocking at the College Door:
Projections of High School Graduates by State and Race/Ethnicity 1996–2012.
Boulder, CO: 1998. State and local appropriations for higher
education
Center for Higher Education & Finance. Grapevine: A National Database of Tax
Support for Higher Education. Normal, IL: Illinois State University. Per
$1,000 personal income and per capita (FY2001) data are from http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/grapevine/table10.html
(accessed 5/28/02). Data for percentage change in state appropriations
(FY1992–2002) are from http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/grapevine/table3.html
(accessed 5/28/02). SHARE OF STATE APPROPRIATIONS CHART
National Association of State Budget Officers, State Expenditure Report, 1990 and 2000
editions. Washington, D.C.: 1991, 2001. ETHNIC DISTRIBUTION CHART
State population U.S. Bureau of the Census. Population Estimates for States by Race and Hispanic Origin, July 1,
1999. Table ST-99-32. http://www.census.gov/ (accessed
5/29/02). Students enrolled in higher education National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2001.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2002. Table 211. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/digest2001/
(accessed 5/29/02). GRADINGStep 1. Identify indicatorsMeasuring Up is built on a foundation of 34 quantitative indicators. Each performance category-preparation, participation, affordability, completion, and benefits-has several indicators. All of these indicators:
Each indicator is assigned a mathematical weight based on its importance to the performance category-as informed by research and policy experience. For each category, the sum of all weights is 100%. Step 3. Identify top states for each indicator State results on each indicator are converted to a scale of 0 to 100, using the top five states as the benchmark. This conversion-called indexing-is a statistical method that allows for accurate comparisons of different measures. In Measuring Up 2002, the median of the top five states (or the third best state) scores 100. This establishes a high, but achievable standard of performance on each indicator. Step 4. Identify best state for each category State scores for each category are calculated from the state's index scores on the indicators and the indicators' weights. In each category, the sum of all the index scores on the indicators times the weights of the indicators is the raw category score for the state. These raw category scores are then converted to a scale of 0 to 100 based on the performance of the top state in the category. Step 5. Assign grades Grades are assigned based on the category index scores, using a grading scale common in many high school and college classes. Grading Scale
back to top |